Skip to main content

A tale of three weddings, pt 3 – Hannah’s story.

 

                                                                                The church at Kirk Ireton, Derbyshire

Hannah Slater was born in the Derbyshire village of Kirk Ireton in 1842. In 1864 she married William Holyland in Ashbourne and their daughter was born the following day but lived only a few weeks. William subsequently joined the army and, many years later, remarried, but there was no record of Hannah’s death. Neither did any of the subsequent censuses include a Hannah Holyland of her age and birthplace. What had happened to her?

I realised that my spreadsheets contained another possible clue - a mystery Holyland baptism. On September 15 1867 Joseph Holyland was baptised in Kirk Ireton, with his mother’s name given as Hannah and no father named. Joseph (“an infant”) was buried just 5 days later. Surely this had to be connected?

The plot thickened with the realisation that there is neither birth nor death listed on freeBMD for Joseph Holyland at this time and place. There is however the birth and death of Joseph SLATER (Hannah’s maiden name), with no mother’s maiden name shown. Was this the same Joseph? Was Hannah now using her maiden name again? Had the parish priest chosen to override this and to christen and bury her son using Hannah’s married name? As Hannah had “made her mark” on her marriage certificate, perhaps she was unable to read the church register entry showing her son as Holyland.

Was Joseph actually William’s son? Given that William had enlisted for the army in Liverpool 10 months earlier, he may well not have been; but it cannot be ruled out, as William and Hannah’s first child was not baptised until 2 months old. If Hannah had delayed Joseph’s baptism similarly, his conception could have been a parting gift from a departing husband!

Of course, since Hannah’s first child was born the day after her wedding to William, it’s quite possible that she was not William’s genetic child either.

I suspect that Hannah appears under her maiden name in the 1871 census, working as a dairy maid in Idridgehay, just 2 miles from Kirk Ireton –and apparently single. What is certain is that on Feb 19 1876, Hannah Slater, a farm servant and (allegedly!) a spinster, married John Boden in the registry office at Bakewell. Hannah’s father was named as Samuel Slater and Hannah “made her mark” with a cross, just as she had done when she married William. She gave her age as 23 (John was 22) and would actually have been 34, but subsequent censuses backtrack this a little with a year of birth around 1848-49, and handily confirm her place of birth as Kirk Ireton.  


Hannah had three children with John Boden; they never left rural Derbyshire. I suspect that she died in 1894 as there is a matching death registration with the correct age of 51, so if this is correct, she obviously confessed her true age to her family at some point!

But did Hannah Slater or William Holyland ever tell their second spouses about their first, seemingly forgotten, but still legally binding marriage? We will never know. 

https://holylandons.blogspot.com/2020/12/a-tale-of-three-weddings-pt-1-first.html 

https://holylandons.blogspot.com/2020/12/a-tale-of-three-weddings-pt-2-williams.html 

 

Comments

  1. Nice series of articles! Could William and Hannah have been legally divorced? Divorce records can be hard to track down. Then they might have still listed themselves as bachelor & spinster on subsequent marriages, even though untrue.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hadn't thought of that! I have found divorce records for a different couple from 1880 so I shall have a nosy around - some do exist and are available.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Spreading out

Early records show Holyland (+variants) families in Leicestershire, London and Cheshire, but in this post I’ll deal solely with the geographical spread of the Leicestershire families. For over a hundred years after the start of the Desford church registers, there seems to have been little movement. Some of the Holyland men married in other parishes, even other counties, but brought their wives back to the village and raised their families there.  The first significant settlement outside Desford seems to have been in the late 1600s, with the appearance of a family just across the border in the north of Warwickshire. However, there was also movement within Leicestershire around this time.  Two wills from the 1720s/30s show the existence of a Holyland family with adult children, living in Botcheston. Botcheston is a small village barely 2 miles from Desford, and it seems inconceivable that these Holylands would not be part of the Desford clan; however, it has not (yet) been p

The Holyland who wasn't

Years ago, when I was fairly new to genealogy, I was approached by someone who knew of my interest in the Holyland surname. They’d received a marriage certificate for their ancestor, Ann Holyland, which gave Ann’s father’s name as Peter. Did I know anything about this branch of the family? I had never come across a Peter Holyland a nd my correspondent and I agreed that Ann was probably illegitimate and had “invented” Peter Holyland to assuage Victorian propriety. More recently, someone else got in touch with the same query and this time, with more experience and resources to call on, I decided to look at this more carefully. Ann Holyland married Thomas Lant in a civil ceremony in Leicester on 5 September 1863. Ann was 19, and gave her father’s details as Peter Holyland (deceased), a maltster.  There are two girls called Ann Holyland of roughly the right age in the records; I discounted one who was the daughter of Thomas and Harriet Holyland. The other was born il