Skip to main content

A tale of three weddings, pt 1 – The first marriage.

                                                      map of central Derbyshire


This is a story of a marriage that broke down, and of two subsequent bigamous marriages. 

When collating Holyland birth registrations, I spotted that of Sarah Hannah Holyland in Ashbourne, Derbyshire, in 1864. The Heage parish register showed that Sarah was baptised there on June 3 1864; her parents were William Holyland, a labourer, and Hannah, from Pentrich, and Sarah had been born on March 29 of that year. Sadly, little Sarah was buried 6 days later at the age of 9 weeks at Heage, although unlike her birth, the death was registered in the Belper district. 

There were no other Holyland births or deaths in the area around that time, although there was one marriage – that of William Holyland and Hannah Slater in Ashbourne in the first quarter of 1864. Thanks to the GRO website I could see that Sarah’s mother’s maiden name was Slater, so this was obviously the correct marriage. But who was William Holyland? I knew he wasn’t native to Derbyshire – there were no Holyland families from this area. How did this family fit into my study? Obviously I needed a copy of the marriage certificate, which I duly bought. 

 I learnt from this that William was “of full age” and a farm servant living in Belper; his father was named as Thomas Holyland, also a farm labourer. Hannah was 22, a farm servant in Ashbourne, and the daughter of Samuel Slater. She and William married in the registry office in Ashbourne and Hannah may well have been in labour whilst she made her mark on the certificate, as Sarah was born the following day! 


Thanks to my previously-mentioned obsession with spread sheets, (https://holylandons.blogspot.com/2020/06/in-praise-of-spreadsheets.html) I could immediately see that there was in fact only one William Holyland across the whole of England that fitted the bill. This William Holyland was baptised in January 1844 in Syston, Leicestershire ; his mother Sarah had died when William was young and by 1861, his father Thomas was working as a carter in Crich, Derbyshire, just 3 miles from both Pentrich and Heage. William himself was probably then working as a shepherd in Nottinghamshire. 

Similarly, I could only find one likely candidate for Hannah Slater; born in Kirk Ireton (also in the Ashbourne registration district) in 1844, the daughter of Samuel Slater and his wife Sarah. Hannah was with her family in Kirk Ireton in the 1851 census – I have as yet been unable to find her in the 1861 census. So now I had the correct family and knew where came from and where they fitted in to the wider Holyland tree.

But where did they go? There were no other registered births for this couple and no sign of them in 1871. Neither could I see any likely death registrations for William or for Hannah. Further sleuthing was needed, and part 2 of this will tell of what I found about William’s story. 

https://holylandons.blogspot.com/2020/12/a-tale-of-three-weddings-pt-2-williams.html 

https://holylandons.blogspot.com/2020/12/a-tale-of-three-weddings-pt-3-hannahs.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A tale of three weddings, pt 3 – Hannah’s story.

                                                                                  The church at Kirk Ireton, Derbyshire Hannah Slater was born in the Derbyshire village of Kirk Ireton in 1842. In 1864 she married William Holyland in Ashbourne and their daughter was born the following day but lived only a few weeks. William subsequently joined the army and, many years later, remarried, but there was no record of Hannah’s death. Neither did any of the subsequent censuses include a Hannah Holyland of her age and birthplace. What had happened to her? I realised that my spreadsheets contained another possible clue - a mystery Holyland baptism. On September 15 1867 Joseph Holyland was baptised in Kirk Ireton, with his mother’s name given as Hannah and no father named. Joseph (“an infant”) was buried just 5 days later. Surely this had to be connected? The plot thickened with the realisation that there is neithe r birth nor death listed on freeBMD for Joseph Holyland at this time and pl

Spreading out

Early records show Holyland (+variants) families in Leicestershire, London and Cheshire, but in this post I’ll deal solely with the geographical spread of the Leicestershire families. For over a hundred years after the start of the Desford church registers, there seems to have been little movement. Some of the Holyland men married in other parishes, even other counties, but brought their wives back to the village and raised their families there.  The first significant settlement outside Desford seems to have been in the late 1600s, with the appearance of a family just across the border in the north of Warwickshire. However, there was also movement within Leicestershire around this time.  Two wills from the 1720s/30s show the existence of a Holyland family with adult children, living in Botcheston. Botcheston is a small village barely 2 miles from Desford, and it seems inconceivable that these Holylands would not be part of the Desford clan; however, it has not (yet) been p

Hannah Holyland and the Duke of Buccleuch

How the name of a lass from a Leicestershire village became linked to Scottish nobility! In 1886, a civil action (“ Robinson vs The Duke of Buccleuch “) was brought in the courts by Benjamin Robinson, a labourer of Glen Parva, Leicestershire, against the 6 th Duke of Buccleuch. Twelve years earlier, the Duke had bought property at Knightlow, Warwickshire; but Benjamin asserted that he was the rightful owner of the property according to the will made by a greatuncle, George Robinson, in 1821. The inheritance trail was complicated and Benjamin’s claim to the estate was disputed. William Henry Walter Montagu Douglas Scott, 6th Duke of Buccleuch   and 8th Duke of Queensberry – the relevant duke!! Benjamin’s grandfather was said to be George Robinson’s brother John, who had married Hannah Holyland. John and Hannah Robinson had had one son, also John, who was Benjamin’s father. The case was widely reported in newspapers across England.   There was some confusion over the bride’s