Skip to main content

An unusual marriage certificate

 

Willoughby Holyland was born in 1868 in Lutterworth, Leicestershire; there is no entry for his mother’s maiden name on the birth registration, implying that he was illegitimate.

He was listed in 1871 as “Willie”, the 1 year old son of Charles Holyland, a shoeing smith in Lutterworth, and his wife Ann. Three other children were listed in the same family, including a William apparently only one year old than “Willie”. Immediately this duplication of names sounds suspicious! Charles repeated that he was Willoughby’s father, as well as William’s, in 1881. In 1891, Willoughby, now a tailor by trade, was still in Charles’ and Ann’s household, but this time described as Charles’s nephew.

Willoughby’s marriage certificate sheds light on his true parentage. In August 1899, he married Lily Sarah Beatrice Davies at St Jude’s Church, in Birmingham. In my experience of looking at Victorian marriage certificates, those born illegitimately usually either have a line drawn through the box for the father’s details, or invent a father’s name, or use that of a subsequent stepfather. Willoughby did none of these things – instead, under “Father’s name and surname”, it clearly states, “Son of Sarah Holyland”. The space for the father’s occupation is left blank.

I have not seen the mother named in place of the father on any other marriage certificate from this era – has anyone else?

I believe that Willoughby’s mother Sarah was probably the older sister of Charles, the blacksmith who variously described Willoughby as his son or nephew in the censuses.  Sarah was baptised in Lutterworth in 1831; by 1851 she was working as a servant in the house of a clergyman in Leicester, and by 1871 she had moved to Marylebone, London, where she remained working as a servant until her death in 1885. She never married.  Did she fall pregnant in London and return to the family home to have the baby, then pick up her life where it left off? Or did she go to London after Willoughby’s birth to start again with a clean slate, leaving her baby in the care of her brother?  I don’t suppose I will ever know.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A tale of three weddings, pt 3 – Hannah’s story.

                                                                                  The church at Kirk Ireton, Derbyshire Hannah Slater was born in the Derbyshire village of Kirk Ireton in 1842. In 1864 she married William Holyland in Ashbourne and their daughter was born the following day but lived only a few weeks. William subsequently joined the army and, many years later, remarried, but there was no record of Hannah’s death. Neither did any of the subsequent censuses include a Hannah Holyland of her age and birthplace. What had happened to her? I realised that my spreadsheets contained another possible clue ...
2 comments
Read more

Spreading out

Early records show Holyland (+variants) families in Leicestershire, London and Cheshire, but in this post I’ll deal solely with the geographical spread of the Leicestershire families. For over a hundred years after the start of the Desford church registers, there seems to have been little movement. Some of the Holyland men married in other parishes, even other counties, but brought their wives back to the village and raised their families there.  The first significant settlement outside Desford seems to have been in the late 1600s, with the appearance of a family just across the border in the north of Warwickshire. However, there was also movement within Leicestershire around this time.  Two wills from the 1720s/30s show the existence of a Holyland family with adult children, living in Botcheston. Botcheston is a small village barely 2 miles from Desford, and it seems inconceivable that these Holylands would not be part of the Desford clan; however, it has not (ye...
2 comments
Read more

The Holyland who wasn't

Years ago, when I was fairly new to genealogy, I was approached by someone who knew of my interest in the Holyland surname. They’d received a marriage certificate for their ancestor, Ann Holyland, which gave Ann’s father’s name as Peter. Did I know anything about this branch of the family? I had never come across a Peter Holyland a nd my correspondent and I agreed that Ann was probably illegitimate and had “invented” Peter Holyland to assuage Victorian propriety. More recently, someone else got in touch with the same query and this time, with more experience and resources to call on, I decided to look at this more carefully. Ann Holyland married Thomas Lant in a civil ceremony in Leicester on 5 September 1863. Ann was 19, and gave her father’s details as Peter Holyland (deceased), a maltster.  There are two girls called Ann Holyland of roughly the right age in the records; I discounted one who was the daughter of Thomas and Harriet Holyland. The other was bor...
1 comment
Read more