Skip to main content

An 18th century cure for kidney stones.



 
 
It's not often that medical details of ancestors from the 18th century come to light. Even with the commencement of death certification, causes of death must often have been nothing more than "best guesses".

So I was delighted to come across this detail from the Northampton Mercury, published on 22 June 1772. 

Francis Holyland was a farmer in Earl Shilton, Leicestershire. He was baptised there in  1729, married twice, and fathered a total of 16 children.

lithotomyFrom the description given in the newspaper letter, he suffered from stones in the renal tract ("the Stone and Gravel"). Treatment for stones in the 18th century sounds nothing short of barbaric; the only way of removing them was if they were in the bladder, when the patient was held down on their back, legs akimbo, and the surgeon cut up through the perineum (that muscular area just in front of the anus) and into the bladder. This was done without anaesthetic, and I can't imagine that many people would have survived the almost inevitable subsequent wound infection. Of course, this did nothing to tackle any other stones that were still in the kidney. A little later, the fashion arose for removing stones in the bladder via the urethra (the "tube" that carries the urine away from the bladder, down which we pee!). This didn't involve cutting but of necessity had to be done "blind" - there are reports of surgeons passing a long nail into the bladder then using a hammer on the nail to fragment the stone so it could be passed when the patient urinated! (1)

It is easy to see why people would try anything other than surgery to relieve the pain of stones. How thankful Francis must have been to find a "cure"! If only we could discover what it contained!

Francis lived another 28 years after this letter was published, and was buried in the graveyard at Earl Shilton in October 1800, age 72. I hope he remained free of his renal stones!

      

   

                   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A tale of three weddings, pt 3 – Hannah’s story.

                                                                                  The church at Kirk Ireton, Derbyshire Hannah Slater was born in the Derbyshire village of Kirk Ireton in 1842. In 1864 she married William Holyland in Ashbourne and their daughter was born the following day but lived only a few weeks. William subsequently joined the army and, many years later, remarried, but there was no record of Hannah’s death. Neither did any of the subsequent censuses include a Hannah Holyland of her age and birthplace. What had happened to her? I realised that my spreadsheets contained another possible clue ...

Spreading out

Early records show Holyland (+variants) families in Leicestershire, London and Cheshire, but in this post I’ll deal solely with the geographical spread of the Leicestershire families. For over a hundred years after the start of the Desford church registers, there seems to have been little movement. Some of the Holyland men married in other parishes, even other counties, but brought their wives back to the village and raised their families there.  The first significant settlement outside Desford seems to have been in the late 1600s, with the appearance of a family just across the border in the north of Warwickshire. However, there was also movement within Leicestershire around this time.  Two wills from the 1720s/30s show the existence of a Holyland family with adult children, living in Botcheston. Botcheston is a small village barely 2 miles from Desford, and it seems inconceivable that these Holylands would not be part of the Desford clan; however, it has not (ye...

The Holyland who wasn't

Years ago, when I was fairly new to genealogy, I was approached by someone who knew of my interest in the Holyland surname. They’d received a marriage certificate for their ancestor, Ann Holyland, which gave Ann’s father’s name as Peter. Did I know anything about this branch of the family? I had never come across a Peter Holyland a nd my correspondent and I agreed that Ann was probably illegitimate and had “invented” Peter Holyland to assuage Victorian propriety. More recently, someone else got in touch with the same query and this time, with more experience and resources to call on, I decided to look at this more carefully. Ann Holyland married Thomas Lant in a civil ceremony in Leicester on 5 September 1863. Ann was 19, and gave her father’s details as Peter Holyland (deceased), a maltster.  There are two girls called Ann Holyland of roughly the right age in the records; I discounted one who was the daughter of Thomas and Harriet Holyland. The other was bor...