Skip to main content

An 18th century cure for kidney stones.



 
 
It's not often that medical details of ancestors from the 18th century come to light. Even with the commencement of death certification, causes of death must often have been nothing more than "best guesses".

So I was delighted to come across this detail from the Northampton Mercury, published on 22 June 1772. 

Francis Holyland was a farmer in Earl Shilton, Leicestershire. He was baptised there in  1729, married twice, and fathered a total of 16 children.

lithotomyFrom the description given in the newspaper letter, he suffered from stones in the renal tract ("the Stone and Gravel"). Treatment for stones in the 18th century sounds nothing short of barbaric; the only way of removing them was if they were in the bladder, when the patient was held down on their back, legs akimbo, and the surgeon cut up through the perineum (that muscular area just in front of the anus) and into the bladder. This was done without anaesthetic, and I can't imagine that many people would have survived the almost inevitable subsequent wound infection. Of course, this did nothing to tackle any other stones that were still in the kidney. A little later, the fashion arose for removing stones in the bladder via the urethra (the "tube" that carries the urine away from the bladder, down which we pee!). This didn't involve cutting but of necessity had to be done "blind" - there are reports of surgeons passing a long nail into the bladder then using a hammer on the nail to fragment the stone so it could be passed when the patient urinated! (1)

It is easy to see why people would try anything other than surgery to relieve the pain of stones. How thankful Francis must have been to find a "cure"! If only we could discover what it contained!

Francis lived another 28 years after this letter was published, and was buried in the graveyard at Earl Shilton in October 1800, age 72. I hope he remained free of his renal stones!

      

   

                   

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Swimming lessons

Arthur Holyland was born in 1877 in Wortley, a village to the north of Sheffield, in Yorkshire. Like his father and grandfather before him, Arthur trained as a blacksmith. When he was a child, Arthur's family moved from the rural setting of Wortley and into the heavily industrialised centre of Sheffield, which at the time was one of the world's leading centres for the manufacturing of steel items. In August 1899, Arthur enlisted into the Royal Marines, giving his age as 2 years younger than his baptism proves. He served on a variety of vessels before being invalided out of the Marines in 1908. My eye was caught by a small box at the bottom of the Marines enlistment form . "Able to swim?" – Yes, Arthur could swim – he was tested on this in December 1899, in Deal, Kent, four months after joining the Royal Marines. How did a blacksmith from a heavily industrialised town in a landlocked county learn to swim, I asked myself. It transpires that in 1892, a tidal swi...
Post a Comment
Read more

When the Internet has it wrong! The real father of Mary.

  This lovely young woman was Mary Carmichael Smyth, the wife of James Carmichael Smyth, physician extraordinary to King George 111. Mary married James, who was several years her senior, in Gretna Green in 1775; the couple had 10 children and Mary apparently died in 1803 or 1806. This portrait was painted around 1788 by George Romney and is the possession of the National Gallery of Scotland . Multiple internet sources state that Mary's father was Thomas Holyland of Bromley, and her mother Mary Elton (eg, here: http://www.thepeerage.com/p20538.htm#i205375 ). However I am certain that these internet sources (many of which have probably been copied from each other) are wrong, and that Mary’s father was actually Christopher Holyland, a vintner of Cheapside in London, who died in 1769. Here’s my evidence. Firstly, I can find no baptism for a Mary Holyland (or variant on the name) to a father named Thomas in the south east of England in the mid 1700s. There was a baptism of Mary ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Spreading out

Early records show Holyland (+variants) families in Leicestershire, London and Cheshire, but in this post I’ll deal solely with the geographical spread of the Leicestershire families. For over a hundred years after the start of the Desford church registers, there seems to have been little movement. Some of the Holyland men married in other parishes, even other counties, but brought their wives back to the village and raised their families there.  The first significant settlement outside Desford seems to have been in the late 1600s, with the appearance of a family just across the border in the north of Warwickshire. However, there was also movement within Leicestershire around this time.  Two wills from the 1720s/30s show the existence of a Holyland family with adult children, living in Botcheston. Botcheston is a small village barely 2 miles from Desford, and it seems inconceivable that these Holylands would not be part of the Desford clan; however, it has not (ye...
2 comments
Read more