Skip to main content

Shipwrecked! The Waterloo convict ship.


In the 80 years between 1788 and 1868, over 160,000 people were transported from the UK to Australia for various crimes (1). The option of transportation rather than imprisonment in the UK could be attractive to some convicts, but not all who boarded the ships arrived safely. This was the case for many of those on the convict ship Waterloo, which left England bound for Van Diemen's Land in 1842.

One of those on board the Waterloo was Richard Holyland. Richard was baptised in Desford, Leicestershire, in 1806, the first child of his parents William and Hannah, and in 1825 married Elizabeth Clamp in the nearby village of Ibstock. The 1841 census shows the couple in Ibstock with five children, the youngest just 2 years old; Elizabeth would be pregnant again within a few months.

Like many in the village, Richard was a framework knitter (FWK). This semiskilled trade had been the lifeblood for many families across the Midland counties, where whole families were involved producing piecework from knitting frames kept in the family home. However by the 1840s, the leicestershire textile trade was in decline and poverty and destitution were becoming significant problems in the trade. (2), (3)

It's easy to imagine that this could be why Richard went out poaching one night early in 1842 with several companions, on land belonging to Lord Howe. Details are missing from the court reports, other than that the gang also "mistreated" a gamekeeper. Having been caught, one of them turned Queen's evidence; two were dealt with comparatively leniently, having no previous "form"; but Richard, "having been convicted of various felonies", was sentenced, with others in the gang, to be transported for 14 years.

(In the Summer assizes of 1827 in Leicester, a Richard Holliland had been convicted of housebreaking and sentenced to death,but received a full pardon in 1831. This could have been the same man, but this is not proven. Apart from that,there was one appearance in court in 1835 for larceny; that charge was dropped. I've not been able to confirm any other previous convictions carried by Richard).

Image result for framework knitting machine
Framework knitting machine at Ruddington FWK museum, Leicestershire

On 22 May he was received on board the convict ship Waterloo. The only extra information is that his educational level was assessed as "imperfect" (although unlike many in the same parish register, his signature on the marriage certificate had been quite neatly written). 

The Waterloo left Sheerness on 1 June 1842, bound for Van Diemen's Land; Richard left five children and his wife heavily pregnant with a sixth. This was the seventh time that the Waterloo had been used as a convict ship carrying human cargo to the antipodes and on this journey, under Captain Henry Ager, she was carrying 219 prisoners, 30 soldiers of the 99th regiment, 5 women and 13 children, as well as the crew. The prisoners were routinely kept in irons and below deck on such a journey.

The ship reached the Cape of Good Hope in late August, and anchored in Table Bay, where the captain went onshore to fetch provisions (the ship's surgeon had been concerned about scurvy amongst the prisoners).  On 28 August 1842, after two days of a fierce storm, a hurricane developed. Another troop ship in the bay, the Abercrombie Robinson, was driven ashore, but with minimal loss of life. However, the storm had already broken the topmasts of the Waterloo and the ship, driven towards shore by high seas and winds, heeled over. Shortly before this, the ship's surgeon had ordered the convicts to be freed from their irons, but this was not enough to save most of them. There were no lifeboats or rescue systems in place, either on the Waterloo or on shore, and horrified onlookers could only watch as the ship was torn apart on the rocks.  
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e2/Waterloo_Wreck00.jpg
Image of the shipwreck by the lithographer, Charles Hutchins, after a sketch by Lieutenant Hext of The King's Own Regiment                                 

In total, 189 people died-- 143 convicts, 15 soldiers, 17 wives and children, and 14 crew members. The captain survived. Amongst the dead was Richard Holyland, who, coming from Leicestershire, had probably never seen the sea before embarking. 72 surviving convicts were taken to Cape Town prison, then sailed for Hobart on October 15, eventually arriving in mid November 1842.

News travelled slowly in those days and it was three months before the disaster was reported in the British press. There was much criticism both of the state of the ship, and of the Captain's decisions to anchor where he had, and to leave the boat to go on shore.

" Of the Waterloo it is impossible to speak with moderation. Deadly blame rests somewhere, and justice will, we have no doubt, find out the parties that deserve it."
South African Commercial Advertiser. 31 August 1842.

If you know of someone - convict, navy or soldier - who was involved in transportation in 1842 but "disappears" from the records, perhaps they too were on the Waterloo. A full list can be found here: https://www.british-genealogy.com/forum/threads/39966-Wreck-of-the-Convict-Ship-Waterloo-1842?s=3c0a469a014dff98f4886b2ab8b242f7

Of course, the true list of victims of the shipwreck extends far beyond those drowned. Back in Leicestershire, Richard Holyland's widow Elizabeth changed the family name to Holland. She and her adult children are listed as paupers in the 1851 census. Elizabeth never remarried, and eked out a living as a knitter for the rest of her life.


(1) https://web.archive.org/web/20160101181100/http://www.australia.gov.au/about-australia/australian-story/convicts-and-the-british-colonies

(2) https://www.pressreader.com/uk/who-do-you-think-you-are-magazine/20170606/281547995840657

(3) "Honest People But Destitute. The plight of leicestershire's framework knitters in the 1840s". Jenkins, Jess; publ by Leicestershire Record Office, 2005.

(4) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterloo_(1815_ship)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A tale of three weddings, pt 3 – Hannah’s story.

                                                                                  The church at Kirk Ireton, Derbyshire Hannah Slater was born in the Derbyshire village of Kirk Ireton in 1842. In 1864 she married William Holyland in Ashbourne and their daughter was born the following day but lived only a few weeks. William subsequently joined the army and, many years later, remarried, but there was no record of Hannah’s death. Neither did any of the subsequent censuses include a Hannah Holyland of her age and birthplace. What had happened to her? I realised that my spreadsheets contained another possible clue - a mystery Holyland baptism. On September 15 1867 Joseph Holyland was baptised in Kirk Ireton, with his mother’s name given as Hannah and no father named. Joseph (“an infant”) was buried just 5 days later. Surely this had to be connected? The plot thickened with the realisation that there is neithe r birth nor death listed on freeBMD for Joseph Holyland at this time and pl

Hannah Holyland and the Duke of Buccleuch

How the name of a lass from a Leicestershire village became linked to Scottish nobility! In 1886, a civil action (“ Robinson vs The Duke of Buccleuch “) was brought in the courts by Benjamin Robinson, a labourer of Glen Parva, Leicestershire, against the 6 th Duke of Buccleuch. Twelve years earlier, the Duke had bought property at Knightlow, Warwickshire; but Benjamin asserted that he was the rightful owner of the property according to the will made by a greatuncle, George Robinson, in 1821. The inheritance trail was complicated and Benjamin’s claim to the estate was disputed. William Henry Walter Montagu Douglas Scott, 6th Duke of Buccleuch   and 8th Duke of Queensberry – the relevant duke!! Benjamin’s grandfather was said to be George Robinson’s brother John, who had married Hannah Holyland. John and Hannah Robinson had had one son, also John, who was Benjamin’s father. The case was widely reported in newspapers across England.   There was some confusion over the bride’s

Spreading out

Early records show Holyland (+variants) families in Leicestershire, London and Cheshire, but in this post I’ll deal solely with the geographical spread of the Leicestershire families. For over a hundred years after the start of the Desford church registers, there seems to have been little movement. Some of the Holyland men married in other parishes, even other counties, but brought their wives back to the village and raised their families there.  The first significant settlement outside Desford seems to have been in the late 1600s, with the appearance of a family just across the border in the north of Warwickshire. However, there was also movement within Leicestershire around this time.  Two wills from the 1720s/30s show the existence of a Holyland family with adult children, living in Botcheston. Botcheston is a small village barely 2 miles from Desford, and it seems inconceivable that these Holylands would not be part of the Desford clan; however, it has not (yet) been p