Skip to main content

Shipwrecked! The Waterloo convict ship.


In the 80 years between 1788 and 1868, over 160,000 people were transported from the UK to Australia for various crimes (1). The option of transportation rather than imprisonment in the UK could be attractive to some convicts, but not all who boarded the ships arrived safely. This was the case for many of those on the convict ship Waterloo, which left England bound for Van Diemen's Land in 1842.

One of those on board the Waterloo was Richard Holyland. Richard was baptised in Desford, Leicestershire, in 1806, the first child of his parents William and Hannah, and in 1825 married Elizabeth Clamp in the nearby village of Ibstock. The 1841 census shows the couple in Ibstock with five children, the youngest just 2 years old; Elizabeth would be pregnant again within a few months.

Like many in the village, Richard was a framework knitter (FWK). This semiskilled trade had been the lifeblood for many families across the Midland counties, where whole families were involved producing piecework from knitting frames kept in the family home. However by the 1840s, the leicestershire textile trade was in decline and poverty and destitution were becoming significant problems in the trade. (2), (3)

It's easy to imagine that this could be why Richard went out poaching one night early in 1842 with several companions, on land belonging to Lord Howe. Details are missing from the court reports, other than that the gang also "mistreated" a gamekeeper. Having been caught, one of them turned Queen's evidence; two were dealt with comparatively leniently, having no previous "form"; but Richard, "having been convicted of various felonies", was sentenced, with others in the gang, to be transported for 14 years.

(In the Summer assizes of 1827 in Leicester, a Richard Holliland had been convicted of housebreaking and sentenced to death,but received a full pardon in 1831. This could have been the same man, but this is not proven. Apart from that,there was one appearance in court in 1835 for larceny; that charge was dropped. I've not been able to confirm any other previous convictions carried by Richard).

Image result for framework knitting machine
Framework knitting machine at Ruddington FWK museum, Leicestershire

On 22 May he was received on board the convict ship Waterloo. The only extra information is that his educational level was assessed as "imperfect" (although unlike many in the same parish register, his signature on the marriage certificate had been quite neatly written). 

The Waterloo left Sheerness on 1 June 1842, bound for Van Diemen's Land; Richard left five children and his wife heavily pregnant with a sixth. This was the seventh time that the Waterloo had been used as a convict ship carrying human cargo to the antipodes and on this journey, under Captain Henry Ager, she was carrying 219 prisoners, 30 soldiers of the 99th regiment, 5 women and 13 children, as well as the crew. The prisoners were routinely kept in irons and below deck on such a journey.

The ship reached the Cape of Good Hope in late August, and anchored in Table Bay, where the captain went onshore to fetch provisions (the ship's surgeon had been concerned about scurvy amongst the prisoners).  On 28 August 1842, after two days of a fierce storm, a hurricane developed. Another troop ship in the bay, the Abercrombie Robinson, was driven ashore, but with minimal loss of life. However, the storm had already broken the topmasts of the Waterloo and the ship, driven towards shore by high seas and winds, heeled over. Shortly before this, the ship's surgeon had ordered the convicts to be freed from their irons, but this was not enough to save most of them. There were no lifeboats or rescue systems in place, either on the Waterloo or on shore, and horrified onlookers could only watch as the ship was torn apart on the rocks.  
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e2/Waterloo_Wreck00.jpg
Image of the shipwreck by the lithographer, Charles Hutchins, after a sketch by Lieutenant Hext of The King's Own Regiment                                 

In total, 189 people died-- 143 convicts, 15 soldiers, 17 wives and children, and 14 crew members. The captain survived. Amongst the dead was Richard Holyland, who, coming from Leicestershire, had probably never seen the sea before embarking. 72 surviving convicts were taken to Cape Town prison, then sailed for Hobart on October 15, eventually arriving in mid November 1842.

News travelled slowly in those days and it was three months before the disaster was reported in the British press. There was much criticism both of the state of the ship, and of the Captain's decisions to anchor where he had, and to leave the boat to go on shore.

" Of the Waterloo it is impossible to speak with moderation. Deadly blame rests somewhere, and justice will, we have no doubt, find out the parties that deserve it."
South African Commercial Advertiser. 31 August 1842.

If you know of someone - convict, navy or soldier - who was involved in transportation in 1842 but "disappears" from the records, perhaps they too were on the Waterloo. A full list can be found here: https://www.british-genealogy.com/forum/threads/39966-Wreck-of-the-Convict-Ship-Waterloo-1842?s=3c0a469a014dff98f4886b2ab8b242f7

Of course, the true list of victims of the shipwreck extends far beyond those drowned. Back in Leicestershire, Richard Holyland's widow Elizabeth changed the family name to Holland. She and her adult children are listed as paupers in the 1851 census. Elizabeth never remarried, and eked out a living as a knitter for the rest of her life.


(1) https://web.archive.org/web/20160101181100/http://www.australia.gov.au/about-australia/australian-story/convicts-and-the-british-colonies

(2) https://www.pressreader.com/uk/who-do-you-think-you-are-magazine/20170606/281547995840657

(3) "Honest People But Destitute. The plight of leicestershire's framework knitters in the 1840s". Jenkins, Jess; publ by Leicestershire Record Office, 2005.

(4) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterloo_(1815_ship)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Holyland - a surname, not just a place!

Holyland - a name and not just a place! Of all the surnames in the world, Holyland is one of the less common. The website Forebears.io uses data from 2014 and tells us that Holyland is the 594,449 th Most Common Surname in the World -- or to put it another way, not very common at all ! According to the Forebears site, approximately 522 people shared the Holyland surname in 2014. The majority (about 2/3) of these were in England; the majority of the other Holylands were in Australia, with tiny numbers of others of this name scattered across the globe, from the USA to China and Jordan.                ( map and data c/o Forebears, https://forebears.io/surnames/holyland) So where did this surname come from? When I found the name in my family tree --it was the maiden name of my great-grandmother - I felt quite excited, assuming that this maybe signified a link to the ge...

Swimming lessons

Arthur Holyland was born in 1877 in Wortley, a village to the north of Sheffield, in Yorkshire. Like his father and grandfather before him, Arthur trained as a blacksmith. When he was a child, Arthur's family moved from the rural setting of Wortley and into the heavily industrialised centre of Sheffield, which at the time was one of the world's leading centres for the manufacturing of steel items. In August 1899, Arthur enlisted into the Royal Marines, giving his age as 2 years younger than his baptism proves. He served on a variety of vessels before being invalided out of the Marines in 1908. My eye was caught by a small box at the bottom of the Marines enlistment form . "Able to swim?" – Yes, Arthur could swim – he was tested on this in December 1899, in Deal, Kent, four months after joining the Royal Marines. How did a blacksmith from a heavily industrialised town in a landlocked county learn to swim, I asked myself. It transpires that in 1892, a tidal swi...

An unusual marriage certificate

  Willoughby Holyland was born in 1868 in Lutterworth, Leicestershire; there is no entry for his mother’s maiden name on the birth registration, implying that he was illegitimate. He was listed in 1871 as “Willie”, the 1 year old son of Charles Holyland, a shoeing smith in Lutterworth, and his wife Ann. Three other children were listed in the same family, including a William apparently only one year old than “Willie”. Immediately this duplication of names sounds suspicious! Charles repeated that he was Willoughby’s father, as well as William’s, in 1881. In 1891, Willoughby, now a tailor by trade, was still in Charles’ and Ann’s household, but this time described as Charles’s nephew. Willoughby’s marriage certificate sheds light on his true parentage. In August 1899, he married Lily Sarah Beatrice Davies at St Jude’s Church, in Birmingham. In my experience of looking at Victorian marriage certificates, those born illegitimately usually either have a line drawn through the box ...