Skip to main content

Hannah Holyland and the Duke of Buccleuch

How the name of a lass from a Leicestershire village became linked to Scottish nobility!

In 1886, a civil action (“Robinson vs The Duke of Buccleuch“) was brought in the courts by Benjamin Robinson, a labourer of Glen Parva, Leicestershire, against the 6th Duke of Buccleuch. Twelve years earlier, the Duke had bought property at Knightlow, Warwickshire; but Benjamin asserted that he was the rightful owner of the property according to the will made by a greatuncle, George Robinson, in 1821. The inheritance trail was complicated and Benjamin’s claim to the estate was disputed.

William Henry Walter Montagu Douglas Scott, 6th Duke of Buccleuch   and 8th Duke of Queensberry – the relevant duke!!

Benjamin’s grandfather was said to be George Robinson’s brother John, who had married Hannah Holyland. John and Hannah Robinson had had one son, also John, who was Benjamin’s father.

The case was widely reported in newspapers across England. 

There was some confusion over the bride’s first name- was she Hannah or Susannah? –as well as various suggested permutations of her surname. The question of validity of the marriage had arisen, and with it, the legitimacy of Benjamin to inherit.

As the Stamford Mercury put it, “A Difficulty arose as to the marriage certificate of John, brother to the testator, and Hannah Holyland, who were married  on the  18 Nov 1782, -- their son John was baptised (at Blaby) on March 15 of the following year”.

The son had joined the army in 1806, and was injured in the Battle of Waterloo. The Stamford Mercury continued, “Shortly after --- this son John – – returned (to his native village) as a pensioner from the army. --- The village traditions said that this pensioner was the son of the John Robinson  who had married Hannah Holyland, Holland, or Olrond, and almost immediately after the marriage deserted her and went to America. Applications were made to the clergymen of Leicestershire, and a reward offered for the certificate of the marriage of the elder John, and after great difficulty a record was found at Aylestone church of the marriage of John Robinson, miller of Enderby, batchelor, and Hannah Holyland.” (1)

How much easier it is now to find such evidence – a few clicks of my mouse and a copy of the much-sought certificate is there on the computer screen! John and Hannah married by licence; John was allegedly a batchelor, age 21 and Hannah a spinster, age 29.


But was John free to marry? The court heard testimony that John was a serial bigamist; he may already have been married prior to meeting Hannah, he may have married another three women subsequently after emigrating, and that anyway the fact of their son John’s baptism being four months later did not prove that he had been born in wedlock. Further confusion was caused by the baptism showing the mother’s name as Susannah, rather than Hannah. Apparently John the elder had become wealthy after emigrating to America and left a bequest to “John Robinson, the son of Hannah Holyland”, raising the question years later as to whether this amounted to a repudiation of paternity.

Nonetheless the judge initially found in Benjamin’s favour. The value of the estate at Knightlow was given as £2400 – a lifetime’s fortune for a labourer!

But who was John Robinson’s bride?  The marriage certificate shows her as Hannah; her son’s baptismal record as Susanna.

 

Luckily for me, the court case also mentioned that the younger John had been named in the will of his paternal grandfather and I was able to trace this. William Holiland, a grazier of Little Glen, Leicestershire, had left bequests in his will of 1794 to his daughter Hannah Robinson and her son John Robinson.

William “Hollyland” had married Ann Boswell in Aylestone in 1744. The church registers show that they baptised 3 daughters –Jane, Susanna and Sarah – but no Hannah. However there is no trace of Susanna after her baptism in 1749. I am left wondering if Hannah and Susanna were one and the same, using different names at various times. If so, Hannah shaved another 5 years off  her age when she married John Robinson, making her about 14 years older than he was (if his given age can be believed!)

And what happened to Benjamin and his newly-awarded riches? In 1886, The Duke of Buccleuch took the case to appeal, where it was decided that it should be reheard in its entirety. (2) I cannot find newspaper reports of the second hearing, but Benjamin’s luck may have ran out – Knightlow is still, to this day, paying “wroth money” (a total of 46p/year!) to the Duke of Buccleuch in his role as Lord of the Manor! (3)

(1)    Stamford Mercury 09 July 188

(2)    Birmingham Daily Post 15 March 1887

(3)    https://www.ourwarwickshire.org.uk/content/article/wroth-silver-ceremony-knightlow-cross

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The vaccine-refusing Holylands!

  With all the talk about how different countries approach COVID vaccination, it seems timely to remember that vaccination against smallpox was compulsory in England in the past Between 1853 – 1947, parents or guardians were obliged to have their children vaccinated against smallpox within the first few months of life. Failure to comply could lead to a fine or even imprisonment. The Holylands were amongst those who were sometimes slow to have their children vaccinated, and the Leicester Mercury lists at least 3 instances: 1877 – Thomas Holyland was fined 10 shillings (it is not clear which Thomas this was, there being several possible candidates!) 1884 – Alfred Holyland of Wharf St, Leicester,   was fined 10 shillings with the threat (or option?) of 7 days imprisonment in lieu of the fine 1885 – Joseph Henry Holyland was summonsed and given one month in which to get his children vaccinated. Joseph and Alfred were brothers. Alfred’s first child was born in 1883, t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Swimming lessons

Arthur Holyland was born in 1877 in Wortley, a village to the north of Sheffield, in Yorkshire. Like his father and grandfather before him, Arthur trained as a blacksmith. When he was a child, Arthur's family moved from the rural setting of Wortley and into the heavily industrialised centre of Sheffield, which at the time was one of the world's leading centres for the manufacturing of steel items. In August 1899, Arthur enlisted into the Royal Marines, giving his age as 2 years younger than his baptism proves. He served on a variety of vessels before being invalided out of the Marines in 1908. My eye was caught by a small box at the bottom of the Marines enlistment form . "Able to swim?" – Yes, Arthur could swim – he was tested on this in December 1899, in Deal, Kent, four months after joining the Royal Marines. How did a blacksmith from a heavily industrialised town in a landlocked county learn to swim, I asked myself. It transpires that in 1892, a tidal swi...
Post a Comment
Read more

When the Internet has it wrong! The real father of Mary.

  This lovely young woman was Mary Carmichael Smyth, the wife of James Carmichael Smyth, physician extraordinary to King George 111. Mary married James, who was several years her senior, in Gretna Green in 1775; the couple had 10 children and Mary apparently died in 1803 or 1806. This portrait was painted around 1788 by George Romney and is the possession of the National Gallery of Scotland . Multiple internet sources state that Mary's father was Thomas Holyland of Bromley, and her mother Mary Elton (eg, here: http://www.thepeerage.com/p20538.htm#i205375 ). However I am certain that these internet sources (many of which have probably been copied from each other) are wrong, and that Mary’s father was actually Christopher Holyland, a vintner of Cheapside in London, who died in 1769. Here’s my evidence. Firstly, I can find no baptism for a Mary Holyland (or variant on the name) to a father named Thomas in the south east of England in the mid 1700s. There was a baptism of Mary ...
Post a Comment
Read more