Skip to main content

Discovery at the National Archives

This month’s topic is “discovery” – so what better to write about than what I found on the Discovery section of the National Archives website?

Many years ago, when I first started exploring family history, my mother told me about a solicitor’s letter that she possessed amongst old family papers. This letter, addressed to Mr J W Holyland (JWH) of 186, Charnwood St, Leicester, and posted in 1911, referred to a claim against the estate of Thomas Bale, deceased. In short, the legal outcome was that JWH and Mrs Rawlings were “the persons entitled to the residue”.

John William Holyland was the older brother of my great grandmother Eveline Holyland; he seems to have been something of a reprobate and had spent his life in poverty. You can read his story (and see his photo!) in a separate post (1).

I knew the Bale surname as well; it was the maiden name of John William Holyland’s paternal grandmother.

As a newbie to family history research, I had no idea how to take this further. Imagine then my excitement when a rather aimless search on the National Archives site threw up this:


TS 33/63

William Bale (early 19th century). Pedigree (or family tree) of descendants, drawn up in 1910. Includes people with the following surnames: Holyland; Rawlings; Perkins; Bull; Neale; Sketchley; Dickson; Upton.

From my nascent genealogical studies, I knew some of these names – this was clearly my family! The record was not (and still is not) digitised but I was able to send away for a copy. (2)

What arrived through the post was an absolute treasure of a hand-drawn family tree which tied in neatly with the letter that my mother had kept. Dated 1908, it shows John William Holyland’s ancestral line back to his great-great-grandfather William Bale, who had died in 1812. The tree is incomplete; several of JWH’s siblings are not represented, and William Bale’s wife is wrongly named; however, other previously unidentified siblings of direct line ancestors were mentioned, allowing me to fill gaps in my tree.



Sadly the photocopy of the handwritten tree that I received from the National Archives is very faint, so this illustration has had to be “enhanced” (but not altered) with a biro!

It appears that Thomas Bale, the testator, had died in 1889. He had been married three times, but had no surviving direct descendants. When his widow Mary died in 1908, claims on the estate were submitted by descendants of two of Thomas Bales’ siblings. JWH and Mrs Rawlings (who turned out to have been born Emma Bale, the younger sister of JWH’s grandmother ) were descended from one line. The other claimant, Martha Barradale, was shown by the court to have descended via an illegitimate line , rendering her claim on the estate invalid.

As the estate had been worth only £51 when Thomas Bale had died 20 years earlier, I suspect that the main beneficiaries of this case were the solicitors. However, for one as poor as John William Holyland, I imagine that any extra money would have been welcome.

(1)   https://holylandons.blogspot.com/2020/01/john-william-holyland-1874-1918_31.html

(2)  https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C3554854


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A tale of three weddings, pt 3 – Hannah’s story.

                                                                                  The church at Kirk Ireton, Derbyshire Hannah Slater was born in the Derbyshire village of Kirk Ireton in 1842. In 1864 she married William Holyland in Ashbourne and their daughter was born the following day but lived only a few weeks. William subsequently joined the army and, many years later, remarried, but there was no record of Hannah’s death. Neither did any of the subsequent censuses include a Hannah Holyland of her age and birthplace. What had happened to her? I realised that my spreadsheets contained another possible clue ...
2 comments
Read more

Spreading out

Early records show Holyland (+variants) families in Leicestershire, London and Cheshire, but in this post I’ll deal solely with the geographical spread of the Leicestershire families. For over a hundred years after the start of the Desford church registers, there seems to have been little movement. Some of the Holyland men married in other parishes, even other counties, but brought their wives back to the village and raised their families there.  The first significant settlement outside Desford seems to have been in the late 1600s, with the appearance of a family just across the border in the north of Warwickshire. However, there was also movement within Leicestershire around this time.  Two wills from the 1720s/30s show the existence of a Holyland family with adult children, living in Botcheston. Botcheston is a small village barely 2 miles from Desford, and it seems inconceivable that these Holylands would not be part of the Desford clan; however, it has not (ye...
2 comments
Read more

The Holyland who wasn't

Years ago, when I was fairly new to genealogy, I was approached by someone who knew of my interest in the Holyland surname. They’d received a marriage certificate for their ancestor, Ann Holyland, which gave Ann’s father’s name as Peter. Did I know anything about this branch of the family? I had never come across a Peter Holyland a nd my correspondent and I agreed that Ann was probably illegitimate and had “invented” Peter Holyland to assuage Victorian propriety. More recently, someone else got in touch with the same query and this time, with more experience and resources to call on, I decided to look at this more carefully. Ann Holyland married Thomas Lant in a civil ceremony in Leicester on 5 September 1863. Ann was 19, and gave her father’s details as Peter Holyland (deceased), a maltster.  There are two girls called Ann Holyland of roughly the right age in the records; I discounted one who was the daughter of Thomas and Harriet Holyland. The other was bor...
1 comment
Read more